WebSep 13, 2012 · Expanding on pfalcon's answer: Run GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR= Webgit merge --squash Commit the changes which have been created by the merge, with a summary commit message. git commit -m Checkout the original branch you want to squash. git checkout Reset to the original commit sha you wish to keep. git reset --soft Rebase this branch based on the new tmp1 branch. …
git - Is Merge Request Squash Commit Option Safe - Stack Overflow
WebNov 8, 2024 · We should note that squash is not a Git command, even if it's a common Git operation. That is, “git squash … ” is an invalid Git command. We'll address two … WebJan 26, 2024 · To squash pull request means commonly to compact all the commits in this request into one (rarely to other number) to make it more concise, readable and not to pollute main branch’s history. To achieve this, a developer needs to use interactive mode of Git Rebase command. Quite often when you develop some new feature you end up with … building a softwash system
git - Squashing commits after they are pushed - Stack Overflow
Web31 # squash/fixup commands. When the first of a series of squash/fixups When the first of a series of squash/fixups 32 # is seen, the file is created and the commit message from the WebMay 12, 2014 · It forces Git to create a merge commit to bring two histories together. git merge --squash would do something a little different. It prevents Git from creating a merge commit, but still pulls in the changes C and D made, so your tree looks like this: A --> B --> F' C --> D. F' contains changes C and D made, but there's no sign of the fact you ... WebOct 30, 2024 · Pull Requests. As a general rule, when merging a pull request from a feature branch with a messy commit history, you should squash your commits. There are exceptions, but in most cases, squashing results in a cleaner Git history that’s easier for the team to read. For context, our team uses a version of Git Flow, which means team … building a solar cell phone charger